|
Central Eurasia: I. Yugoslavia: Worker-Managed Market SocialismA. Idealized Yugoslav system:1. Social ownership; democratic workers' management.2. Market coordination in short run; indicative planning in long run.3. Workers paid a share of enterprise profits.4. Government uses market-oriented fiscal & monetary policies.B. Backwardness and Central Planning1. Ottoman and Serbian domination.2. Before World War II - feudalism and land reform.3. After the war - unity under Tito and central planning.C. The 1950s: Worker's Self-Management and the Visible Hand1. Tito-Stalin confrontation.2. In 1950, Basic Law on self-management adopted.3. In 1951, detailed central planning replaced with the Visible Hand.4. In 1952-53, agriculture liberalized and decollectivized.D. The 1960s: Worker-Managed Market Socialism1. In 1961, division of National and commercial banks.2. In 1965, Yugoslav "shock therapy":a. Many price controls lifted.b. Investment funds transferred to banks.c. Exposure to foreign competition.d. Greater enterprise autonomy.e. Still less detail in central planning.3. In 1967, banks reorganized into independent basic banks, associated banks, and internal banks.E. The 1970s: Radical Decentralization - Constitution of 1974 established:1. collective and rotating presidency.2. Basic Organizations of Associated Labor (BOALs)F. The 1980s: After Tito1. Rotating presidency and economic instability.2. 1991 constitutional crisis, declarations of independence, and civil war.G. Evaluation of the Yugoslav System1. General considerationsa. benefits - economic democracy and strong work incentives. J.S. Mill - “common interest of all the workers in the work."b. criticisms - inconsistency (economic democracy under one-party state), not genuine (little true participation), cumbersome (especially with BOALs), wrong decisions (low allocative efficiency and stability).2. Supply Response and Productivity - Ward model (below) says reaction to price destabilize markets - mixed empirical evidence.3. Market Entry - little opportunity or incentive for entrepreneurs.4. Saving and Investment - no portable ownership rights.5. Inflationa. Absence of hard budget constraint.b. Workers could vote for pay raises.c. Circulation of trade credits and promissory notes among enterprises.6. Unemployment - above 11 percent between 1984 and 1988, plus 3-6 percent working outside the country.a. Rapid growth of industrial labor force.b. Linguistic and cultural barriers.c. Reluctance of worker-managed enterprises to hire and share income.7. Economic Growth - higher than OECD average or most socialist countries. Explained by growth of capital stock.8. Income Inequality and Poverty - never developed a remarkably even distribution of income. Relatively high poverty rate.a. Regional inequalities.b. Enterprise income differentials under self-management.9. Consumer Sovereignty - market gave Yugoslav consumers advantage over those in centrally planned economies.10. Natural Environment - self-management allowed Yugoslavs to choose between income and clean environment.H. Appendix: The Theory of the Labor-Managed Firm1. Benjamin Ward's Modela. Assumptions - Firm maximizes income per worker rather than total profits. Otherwise, assumptions are identical to standard textbook theory of competitive firm: price taker sells a single product, produced according to standard production function with variable labor and fixed capital inputs.b. Conclusion - An increase in market price causes a reduction in employment and production--the supply curve is negatively sloped. Market potentially unstable.2. Exceptions - The supply curve may be positively sloped under alternate assumptions; for example, if labor is not the only variable input, if there is more than one final product, or if a rise in price today causes us to expect the price to fall in the future.II. Hungary: Administrative Market SocialismA. BackgroundRelatively small, most trade-dependent country in region.1950-1954 - First Five-Year Plan, Stalinist model1956 Anti-Communist demonstration drew a brutal Soviet response.1965-1967 - Successful agricultural reforms.B. The New Economic MechanismProvisions:1. Detailed central planning replaced with regulated market and indicative planning.2. Profit motive replaced of bonuses for plan fulfillment.3. Aside from raw materials and consumer staples, price controls were lifted from a wide range of products, and many other prices were allowed to fluctuate within limits.4. State monopoly of foreign trade was weakened.5. No challenge to Communist power structure. Support for the NEM declined during the early 1970s; central controls reintroduced in 1973.C. The 1980s: The New Improved Mechanism1. Prices - Under competitive price system, most industrial prices approximate world market levels.2. Industrial Organization and Competitiona. Dissolution of large enterprises and trusts.b. New small, competitive organizations in the public and private sectors. Cooperatives, enterprise contract work associations (ECWAs), independent contract work associations (ICWAs).3. Enterprise Autonomy and Democracya. Three industrial ministries merged in 1980 into Ministry of Industry.b. Decentralization of foreign trade continued.c. In 1984, Law on Enterprise Democracy assigned state companies to three categories of control: centralized, enterprise council, and Yugoslav-style labor management.4. Finance and Monetary Policya. Bond market established in 1983; secondary trading in 1984.b. In 1987 the National Bank of Hungary became Western-style central bank, but not independent.5. Bankruptcy - code implemented in 1986, but few state enterprises were threatened by the law.6. Taxation - profit tax revised in 1989, with reduced rate, with revenue replaced by VAT and revised personal income tax.D. Evaluation of the Hungarian System1. Successesa. Quickest growth of industrial labor productivity in Eastern Europe during early 1980s; even more success in agriculture.b. During 1980s, export sales grew more rapidly than other countries in its income category and remained solvent through the debt crisis.c. Ended 1980s, more
even distribution of income than any country in Central Eurasia except
Czechoslovakia.
|